Supreme Court Will Review ‘Speech-Free Zones’ At Polling Places

The Daily Caller | 11/14/2017 | Staff
hoppers911 (Posted by) Level 4
Click For Photo: http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Voters-preparing-to-cast-ballots-in-November-2016.-YouTube-screenshotAssociated-Press-e1510681802872.png

Polling places are one of the few public spaces where First Amendment rights are significantly curtailed. Pamphleteering is often prohibited inside local precincts, an obvious infringement on the rights of speech and assembly. Many states have adopted laws banning photography at the polls, including so-called ballot selfies, that would seem to contravene the rights of expression and a free press.

The Supreme Court agreed to review one of the most stringent polling place regulations in the country Monday, a Minnesota law that forbids voters from wearing political apparel of any sort in or around a polling precinct.

Case - Minnesota - Voters - Alliance - V

The case, Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, was occasioned when Andrew Cilek, the executive director of the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA), was temporarily prevented from voting at his Hennepin County polling place in 2010. Cilek was wearing a tee-shirt featuring the Gadsden flag, which is closely associated with the Tea Party, and a button expressing support for voter identification laws. He was twice refused a ballot because of his partisan attire.

Minnesota state election law reads: “A political badge, political button, or other political insignia may not be worn at or about the polling place on primary or election day.” Cilek and the MVA challenged the provision, claiming it is overbroad and chills protected speech. Though tailored laws enjoining certain types of political expression and activity may pass constitutional muster, the MVA argues a categorical ban “punishes a substantial amount of protected free speech,” like political apparel addressing issues which are unrelated to a matter on the ballot.

Panel - US - Circuit - Court - Appeals

A divided panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found for the state, concluded that a “speech-free...
(Excerpt) Read more at: The Daily Caller
0 other people are viewing this story
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Don't panic!
Sign In or Register to comment.