Federal Judge Strikes Down Regulation Requiring Doctors To Perform Gender Transition Surgeries and Abortions

Washington Free Beacon | 10/15/2019 | Graham Piro
HelloimMeHelloimMe (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GettyImages-1157263234-e1571166673838.jpg

A federal judge struck down a regulation that would have required medical providers receiving federal funding to perform abortions and gender transition surgeries regardless of their personal beliefs, a major victory for religious liberty advocates.

A federal court in Texas said that an Obama-era rule that would have required doctors to perform procedures contrary to their consciences violated federal law. District Court Judge Reed O'Connor said the regulation put forward by the Obama administration in 2016 "substantially burdens" the rights of health care staffers under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

Court - Rule - Exemptions - Plaintiffs - Exercise

"The Court holds that the Rule, which expressly prohibits religious exemptions, substantially burdens Private Plaintiffs' religious exercise in violation of RFRA," the ruling said. "Though the Court maintains that Plaintiffs were entitled to the preliminary injunction granted in its December 31, 2016 Order, it now concludes that the proper remedy at this stage is vacatur of the Rule."

The decision follows a three-year dispute between the federal government and a coalition of several states and religious health care providers. The court issued a temporary injunction against the rule in December 2016, giving the Department of Health and Human Services two years to reform the regulation. While he acknowledged that the agency had made progress in...
(Excerpt) Read more at: Washington Free Beacon
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!