U.S. Oil Firms Challenge Pipeline Surcharge For Steel Tariff

www.oann.com | 4/30/2019 | Staff
HOUSTON (Reuters) – Two U.S. shale producers have challenged an energy pipeline operator’s proposed surcharge for the Trump administration’s 25% tariff on imported steel, raising the stakes for pipeline builders facing higher construction costs.

The United States imposed tariffs on imported steel and aluminum last year to shield U.S. producers from overseas competition. U.S. energy industry trade groups have warned the tariffs could raise costs for companies and consumers.

US - Oil - Producer - ConocoPhillips - Unit

U.S. oil producer ConocoPhillips and a unit of Canadian producer Encana Corp on Monday asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to reject Plains All American Pipeline’s proposed tariff surcharge on its Cactus II oil pipeline, according to a regulatory filing.

Houston-based Plains this month proposed charging shippers a 5 cents per barrel fee on its 670,000 barrel-per-day (bpd) Cactus II pipeline next April to offset higher construction costs due to the steel tariffs.

Tariff - Filing - Describe - Surcharge - ConocoPhillips

“We feel the tariff filing should be denied because it is procedurally incorrect, (and) does not clearly describe or justify the surcharge,” ConocoPhillips spokesman Daren Beaudo said in an email.

Encana and Plains did not respond to requests for comment.

Filing - ConocoPhillips - Encana - Plains - Surcharge

In their filing, ConocoPhillips and Encana said Plains’ surcharge was premature because the U.S. Commerce Department may still grant the pipeline operator an exemption before the fee goes...
(Excerpt) Read more at: www.oann.com
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!