Click For Photo: https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BBTOD3s.img?h=315&w=600&m=6&q=60&o=t&l=f&f=jpg&x=520&y=243&imgtype=.jpghttps://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1037302649199177728
has disgraced the media world. Gotten me wrong for two solid years. Change libel laws? https://t.co/QIqLgvYLLi
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 30, 2017
© SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images US Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits for an official photo.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday called for reconsideration of a landmark First Amendment precedent, criticizing the 1964 decision that the Constitution creates a higher barrier for public figures to claim libel.
Thomas - Court - Decision - Case - Woman
Thomas wrote alongside a court decision not to take up the case of a woman who accused Bill Cosby of sexual misconduct in 2014. He suggested that the seminal case New York Times v. Sullivan, holding that public figures have a higher burden to prove libel, was wrongly decided.
"New York Times and the Court's decisions extending it were policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law," Thomas wrote.
Constitution - Figures - Standard - Defamation - Suits
"If the Constitution does not require public figures to satisfy an actual-malice standard in state-law defamation suits, then neither should we," the opinion states.
He continued, saying "We did not begin meddling in this area until 1964, nearly 175 years after the First Amendment was ratified. The States are perfectly capable of striking an acceptable balance between encouraging robust public discourse and providing a meaningful remedy for reputational harm. We should reconsider our jurisprudence in this area."
Position - Complaints - President - Donald - Trump
His position echoes complaints of President Donald Trump, who has called for...
(Excerpt) Read more at: MSN
Wake Up To Breaking News!