Click For Photo: https://conservativefiringline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/HANDS-OFF-e1533744827143.jpgClick For Photo: https://conservativefiringline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/HANDS-OFF-1200x630.jpg
There is growing resistance from law enforcement professionals to enforce provisions of a restrictive gun control initiative passed by 59 percent of voters last fall in Washington State, and now at least one county commission has adopted a resolution opposing enforcement of Initiative 1639, which raised the legal age for purchasing a semiautomatic rifle from 18 to 21.
In matter-of-fact language, the lawmen are saying they will not enforce a law they believe to be unconstitutional. For example, Klickitat County Sheriff Bob Songer is quoted by The Guardian contending that the law “is unconstitutional on several grounds. I’ve taken the position that as an elected official, I am not going to enforce that law.”
Addition - Songer - Sheriffs - Franklin - Yakima
In addition to Songer, sheriffs in Franklin and Yakima counties have declared that the new law will not be enforced by their agencies, according to published reports. A few other county sheriffs have indicated that enforcement of the measure, which also requires proof of training, a 10-day waiting period, a so-called “enhanced background check” and registration, among the many provisions.
Loren Culp, police chief in Republic, the only incorporated city in Ferry County, and the county seat, has also announced he will not enforce I-1639. The Cowlitz County Commission passed a resolution for non-enforcement.
Fall - Washington - State - Law - Enforcement
Last fall, when the Washington State Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors’ Association (WSLEFIA) opposed the initiative, they likened the training requirement to an unconstitutional “literacy test” such as the ones used in the 1950s to disenfranchise black voters in the South. WSLEFIA was joined in its opposition by the...
Wake Up To Breaking News!