THE STATE OF THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP

Desiring God | 1/20/2019 | Scott Klusendorf
maye (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://dg.imgix.net/all-we-did-was-survive-yzllc26b-en/landscape/all-we-did-was-survive-yzllc26b-61fd65369dbded7176a6863e0db6d9fd.jpg?ts=1547744570&ixlib=rails-3.0.2&auto=format,compress&fit=min&w=800&h=450

ABSTRACT: The pro-life movement in America seemed in dire straits in 2016, with losses on almost every front. Donald Trump’s surprising win appears to have stalled the abortion juggernaut. An escape, however, is not a triumph. Dunkirk was not Normandy. Abortion is here to stay as long as millions of young Christians are uninformed, unequipped, and unconcerned.

We asked Scott Klusendorf, president of Life Training Institute, to give a state of the movement on the pro-life cause under the Trump presidency in our series of feature articles by scholars for pastors, leaders, and teachers. You can download and print a PDF of the article, as well as listen to an audio recording.

Movement - Gathering - Storm

The pro-life movement faced a gathering storm in 2016.

In California, pro-life pregnancy centers were forced to advertise abortion services or pay crippling fines. In New York, Catholic nuns were told to fund abortion in their health-care plans or dissolve. Nationally, pro-life doctors were pressured to refer patients for abortion or risk their medical credentials. Politically, the outlook was grim. Abortion activists were one appointment away from commanding the Supreme Court. A conservative justice was dead. The Republican presidential candidate had lamentable character, and his pro-life commitment was unproven. And the candidate sworn to uphold abortion at any stage of pregnancy appeared to be running away with the election.

God - Providence - Donald - Trump - Win

Then, in God’s strange providence, Donald Trump’s win stalled the abortion juggernaut. Given a choice between a flawed presidential candidate who might limit abortion and one who affirmed it wholesale, a majority of pro-life advocates voted to limit the evil and promote the good insofar as possible.1 Political ambition did not drive them to the polls. Survival instinct did. They feared a Clinton presidency would irrevocably crush their efforts to save children.

Pro-lifers received some immediate relief from the new president. He cut off...
(Excerpt) Read more at: Desiring God
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!