Supreme Court Weighs ‘Double Jeopardy’ Dispute

www.oann.com | 11/30/2018 | Staff
hi09 (Posted by) Level 3
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Supreme Court justices on Thursday expressed skepticism about putting limits on criminal charges being brought against people for the same offenses by both federal and state prosecutors in a case involving an Alabama man charged with illegally possessing a gun.

Depending on how the court rules, the case that could have implications for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into potential collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign.

Court - Lines - Majority - Implications - Precedent

The court appeared divided on non-ideological lines, but a majority seemed concerned about the practical implications of overturning longstanding precedent allowing for parallel state and federal prosecutions.

Some of the justices, including conservative Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch and liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appeared more worried about vindicating the individual rights of defendants.

Trump - Appointee - Court - Brett - Kavanaugh

Trump’s other appointee to the nine-justice court, conservative Brett Kavanaugh, questioned whether there were strong enough arguments to justify ending the practice, saying that the lawyers for defendant Terance Gamble would have to show the precedent is...
(Excerpt) Read more at: www.oann.com
Wake Up To Breaking News!
How's that peak oil working out for you?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!