Sorry, Chelsea Clinton, Research Does Not Show Abortion Is Economically Beneficial to Women

CNS News | 9/7/2018 | Staff
Coraav (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo:

Last month, Chelsea Clinton generated a firestorm of controversy with comments at a “Rise up for Roe” rally in Manhattan about the economic impact of the Roe v. Wade decision. Clinton stated that “American women entering the labor force from 1973 to 2009 added three and a half trillion dollars to our economy.” Her remarks were widely criticized by a number of conservative media outlets including The Federalist, National Review, Breitbart,, and Some commentators disagreed with her economic logic. Others rightly felt that no amount of economic prosperity justified removing legal protections for the unborn.

In the aftermath of this backlash, Clinton took to social media to defend herself. On Twitter she responded to both a Newsweek article and tweets by conservative pundits Erick Erickson and Dinesh D’Souza. Clinton claimed that her remarks were being taken out of context. Specifically, she steered the conversation away from the wealth creation since Roe v. Wade and argued that legalizing abortion created more economic opportunities for women. She tweeted to one woman that “reproductive rights have always been economic rights.”

Responses - Critics - Clinton - Studies - Attempt

In her responses to her online critics, Clinton linked to four studies in an attempt to make the case that legalizing abortion was economically beneficial to women. However, the research she cites fails to advance her argument. Of the four studies, two looked at how access to contraception – not abortion – affected female labor force participation. A third study was a paper published by the Center for American Progress which finds somewhat better economic outcomes for women living in states with...
(Excerpt) Read more at: CNS News
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!