Another journalistic take on Brazilian tribes killing their young? Consider this cautious view

GetReligion | 6/13/2018 | Ira Rifkin
hi09 (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52c2df7ae4b0d215dded86fd/536fab69e4b00b0fd2515399/5b1ef7c81ae6cf7caeb00b74/1528981247865/GlobalWire.png?format=1000w

This post may – but is by no means calculated – to tick off some GetReligion readers.

That possibility is undoubtedly magnified by my taking an alternative position to one of last week’s most popular GR posts, one I believe was so well received because readers identified strongly with its moral point of view.

Colleague - Julia - Duin - Post - Foreign

I’m referring to my colleague Julia Duin’s post on a Foreign Policy story about the Brazilian government’s efforts to outlaw infanticide as practiced by a handful of indigenous tribal groups.

This paragraph gets to the core of the debate tackled in the Foreign Policy piece:

Controversy - Child - Killing - Question - Brazil

The controversy over child killing has raised a fundamental question for Brazil — a vast country that is home to hundreds of protected tribes, many living in varying degrees of isolation: To what extent should the state interfere with customs that seem inhumane to the outside world but that indigenous peoples developed long ago as a means to ensure group survival in an unforgiving environment?

It comes as no surprise to me that Brazil’s burgeoning evangelical Protestant community is leading the legislative effort. It’s no surprise because as you’d expect, this comports with traditional Christianity’s reverence – with some notable historical exceptions – for human life.

Theology - Policy - Journalism - Point

Now, I'm not here to argue theology or public policy. Rather, there’s a journalism point to be made.

Specifically, it's about journalists' ability to mentally and emotionally distance themselves from their core beliefs about religious and cultural mores long enough to intellectually grasp an alternative viewpoint that's very different from their own – and even strikes them as appalling.

Bit - Biases

I'll say more about this a bit below. But first I think it's important to explain my biases.

I’m no fan of abortion, which I believe should be avoided whenever possible, except when the mother’s life is physically endangered; psychological endangerment resulting from rape or...
(Excerpt) Read more at: GetReligion
Wake Up To Breaking News!
How's that peak oil working out for you?
Tagged:
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!