6 Big Questions About What Comes After the Trump-Kim Meeting

The Daily Signal | 6/11/2018 | Staff
abbycraig (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://www.dailysignal.com/wp-content/uploads/Singapore-Kim.jpg

Amid intense attention to the historic meeting between President Donald Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, optimists and skeptics alike have questions about the next step.

The two leaders’ meeting in Singapore was not expected to reach a major breakthrough.

Secretary - State - Mike - Pompeo - Week

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last week the administration would seek progress toward a formal treaty to be ratified by the Senate.

That would make it more difficult for a future president to unravel a deal, as Trump unraveled President Barack Obama’s Iran nuclear deal. It also would provide assurance to Kim that the United States won’t pursue regime change after his country does away with its arsenal.

Treaty - Debate - Home

A treaty also means contentious debate abroad and at home.

“It will really have to be substantial, with almost everything we hoped for, to get Senate confirmation,” Alexander Vershbow, ambassador to South Korea from 2005 to 2008, told The Daily Signal. “If they draw up a treaty, the Senate will want it airtight.”


Here are the six of the big questions remaining:

1. How to Define ‘Denuclearization’?

United - Nations - Resolution - US - Policy

A United Nations resolution and U.S. policy call for “complete, verifiable, irreversible, dismantlement,” of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.

U.S. experts agree that Trump must stand firm on some version of this in an agreement that would guarantee Kim remains in power and lifts economic sanctions on the communist regime.

President - Iran - Deal - Deal - North

“The president can’t walk away from the Iran deal and then reach a deal with North Korea that isn’t verifiable and irreversible denuclearization,” retired Army Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin, a former deputy undersecretary for intelligence at the Defense Department, told The Daily Signal.

“We need to let Kim know that we consider his nuclear program an existential threat to the United States and are willing to use all available means to oppose it,” Boykin said. “Kim will relay to the president that he...
(Excerpt) Read more at: The Daily Signal
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Have you forgotten?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!